First of all, Thanks for everyone who's trying to help here, THANKS!
Now, to explain our situation:
We've already manufactured 100 PCBs (They're quite expensive duo to some components we use there) with the direct connection of CTP to EVE, and it was working great with our LCD module which used Goodix IC, but after increasing the outer glass thickness of our LCD Module for withstanding a vandalism of our product, we have to replace the IC to the HYCON one which supports this, so we now stuck.
In addition, a development round of handling the touch events on the MCU is quite a task for us now, and might delay our product launch, which we want to avoid of course.
So we need a solution to work around this issue.
Now to the point about the replies here:
1. It is definitely true that chip ID registers of the HY vs FT is not the same, BUT, It doesn't seems that EVE checks any registers about the chip ID, so this should be fine.
2. Thanks for the clarification about the clock stretching, but it seems that it don't needs clock stretching when running at about 100KHz (you can see the logics in my posts above), so this should be even better at 57KHz (fast enough for Touch input).
3. From my understanding the all HY families is compatible since their demo code links is directing to the same files, so I assume it should just the same, isn't?
Later today I will be on the office and will try the patch BRT supplied here, and will report back.
Again, I want to thank you all about your assistance.
