My additional points would be:
VERTEX2F:
http://www.brtcommunity.com/index.php?topic=10.0Variants with LVDS interface.
A whole lot more bitmap handles. Like 256 in total.
Additional graphics primitives:
Circle - this needs two POINTS now
Box - like drawing two overlapping RECTS
>Posted by: FlorianG
>The first is the screen resolution.
Well, in theory EVE already supports 2048x2048 pixels. :-)
So to take this point all by itself I would argue that this already is plenty. :-)
But more seriously, yes, I would like to use a panel like this:
https://www.winstar.com.tw/de/products/tft-lcd/ips-tft/ips-lcd.htmlIn case the link does not work, this is a WF101GTYAPLNG0, a 10.1" LVDS IPS 1280x800.
And this is just the first thing I find with Googe and "ips tft".
>The second is a customizable clock frequency.
The clock frequency already is customizable.
But given the rest of your point it looks like you rather wish for a substantial increase in clock frequency in
order to run higher resolution panels at high framerates.
And yes, I totally agree with this.
What is a bit strange is the pixel clock setup in REG_PCLK as fractions of the main clock.
I guess these need to be in sync but the divider does not really work for higher clocks.
72MHz, 36MHz, 24MHz, 18MHz, 14,4MHz, 12MHz, 10,3MHz
This is perfectly fine for small displays needing low clock rates.
But there is no way to setup 48MHz for example.
Maybe a second PLL would help with this issue.
>The last point is about the memory size of the "RAM_CMD" and the "RAM_DL"
I agree, although even double the amount would be nice, so 16kB and 8kB.
Posted by: darkjezter
>Ability to sidestep RAM_DL contention.
Seriously?